THE SPACE
LAUNCH INDUSTRY RECENT TRENDS AND NEAR-TERM OUTLOOK
July
2003
(courtesy of Futron Corporation)
Executive Summary
Since 1996, Futron has
maintained an extensive database of past and future launch activity. Futron
reviews over 20 space-related publications and over 30 on-line spacerelated
resources to collect launch information. The database is updated on a daily
basis.
Using this information as a starting point, Futron analysts
regularly review planned and proposed launch activity and generate launch
forecasts. This type of forecast, referred to as a supply-side
forecast, can be fairly accurate in predicting near-term launch
activity.
With the start of the third quarter of 2003, Futron has
performed a rigorous analysis of future launch activity and generated a
best estimate forecast for the next 18 months. In comparing
projected 2003 and 2004 launch numbers with those from previous years, trends
and significant points become apparent. Among those are:
Forecast Methodology
The first step in developing
Futrons supply-side forecast starts with Futrons Electronic Library
of Space Activity (ELSA). ELSA is an extensive satellite and launch database
that contains over 500,000 pieces of information including over 8,000 distinct
launch events. All historical launches are contained in ELSA as well as
proposed systems that have been announced in the public domain. Source data is
gathered from over fifty open-source periodicals, websites, and technical
documents and entered daily by Futron Analysts. The information in ELSA forms
the basis for many of Futrons consulting projects; however, we do sell
the database, or parts of it, to select customers.
Futron generates an
initial list of planned launches from the information in ELSA. The next step is
to apply analytic judgments regarding the likelihood of the planned launches.
Many announced launches have no realistic chance of being launched as proposed.
The satellites linked to these launches are referred to as paper
satellites and they appear on the initial list because some organization
made a public announcement of its intention to launch a satellite. However,
these announcements are sometimes made for public relations or national pride
reasons.
Futron applies the following types of considerations to the
initial list of announced launches to determine their likelihood of actually
launching:
What remains is a list of projected launches that theoretically could be launched during the time period, or peak load. However, several factors can affect the execution of a scheduled launch. These include:
Based on a historical analysis
of projected versus actual launch activity, Futron has determined that the
above issues tend to reduce the peak load forecast by approximately
25%.
Another factor that must be considered is that some nations do not
announce satellite launches in advance, usually for national security reasons.
This is particularly true in Russia and China. With an in-depth understanding
of historical launch activity and government policy statements, and a general
knowledge of launch activity for various nations, the issue of unannounced
future launch activity can be addressed.
Once all these factors have
been rigorously analyzed, considered and acted upon, the best
estimate of future launch activity is produced.
Forecast Results and Definitions
Tables 1-4 show the number of
commercial launches, non-commercial launches, total launches, and commercial
satellites for the period 1998 through 2004. These tables show actual launch
numbers for 1998 through June 2003 and projected launch numbers from July 2003
through 2004.
Table 1: Commercial Launches by Country, 1998
2004
| Country | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 (Best Estimate) |
2004 (Best Estimate) |
| USA | 22 | 15 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Russia | 5 | 13 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 9 |
| Europe | 9 | 8 | 12 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 7 |
| China | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Multinational | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Japan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| India | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brazil | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Israel | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 40 | 38 | 35 | 16 | 24 | 23 | 26 |
Note: Ukraine had one commercial launch in 1998.
Table 2: Non-Commercial Launches by Country, 1998 2004
| Country | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 (Best Estimate) |
2004 (Best Estimate) |
| USA | 14 | 16 | 21 | 19 | 12 | 23 | 26 |
| Russia | 19 | 15 | 23 | 20 | 17 | 15 | 12 |
| Europe | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| China | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Multinational | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Japan | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| India | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Brazil | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Israel | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 40 | 39 | 50 | 43 | 41 | 49 | 56 |
Note: North Korea had one non-commercial launch (attempt) in 1998.
Table 3: Total Launches by Country, 1998 2004
| Country | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 (Best Estimate) |
2004 (Best Estimate) |
| USA | 36 | 31 | 28 | 22 | 17 | 31 | 32 |
| Russia | 24 | 28 | 36 | 25 | 25 | 22 | 21 |
| Europe | 11 | 10 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 8 | 11 |
| China | 6 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Multinational | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Japan | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| India | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Brazil | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Israel | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 80 | 78 | 85 | 59 | 65 | 72 | 82 |
Table 4: Total Commercial Satellites by Orbit, 1998 2004
| Country | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 (Best Estimate) |
2004 (Best Estimate) |
| GEO | 22 | 22 | 30 | 13 | 23 | 21 | 20 |
| NGSO | 82 | 54 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 12 | 14 |
| TOTAL | 104 | 76 | 49 | 20 | 34 | 39 | 34 |
Definitions
Commercial launches are defined as launches
that are internationally competed (i.e., available in principle to competitors
in the international launch services market), or launches that are licensed by
the U.S. Office of the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space
Transportation of the Federal Aviation Administration, or privately financed
launches.
Commercial satellites are defined as spacecraft that
serve a commercial function or are operated by a commercial entity, without
regard to how they are launched. Certain Russian and Chinese domestic
communications satellites are commercial if a significant portion of the
transponders is offered for lease through commercial operators.
GEO
satellites are spacecraft that operate in geosynchronous orbit an
orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the equator in which a spacecraft
completes one orbit around the Earth every 24 hours.
NGSO
satellites are spacecraft in non-geosynchronous orbits (NGSO), such as low
Earth orbit (LEO), medium Earth orbit (MEO), elliptical orbits, and deep space
probes.
Launches are attributed to the country in which the primary
vehicle manufacturer is based, with the exception of launches by Sea Launch,
which are designated as Multinational.
Trends and Significant Points
Many significant points become apparent from Tables 1-4.
In looking at the total number of launches worldwide (Figure 1), there is no pronounced trend during the entire period shown. Instead, there are year-to-year variations, with the total number of launches increasing in some years and decreasing in others. However, in the latter part of the time period, there is a consistent trend towards increasing numbers of launches. The average annual increase from 2001 to 2004 is 11.5%.
Figure 1: Total Launches Worldwide, 1998 - 2004

While this growth is welcome news to the launch industry, it should be noted that 2001 was the worst year in terms of total launches since 1961. In that year, which coincidentally included President Kennedys announcement regarding a U.S. mission to the moon, there were only 47 total launches.
6 The 16 commercial launches
that occurred in 2001 was the lowest number since 1994, when there were 14.
Since that time, the commercial industry rebounded with 24 launches in 2002 and
Futron predicts that the number of commercial launches will remain steady for
the next two years.
In the classic example of a glass half empty or half
full, this steady rate of between 23 and 26 launches can be viewed as either
good or bad. On one hand, a commercial launch rate in the low 20s is well below
the total launch capacity of the industry and it is also well below the number
of launches experienced during the late 1990s when the LEO telecommunications
satellite constellations were being launched (ORBCOMM, Iridium, and
Globalstar). On the other hand, 23-26 launches a year is well above the number
recorded in 2001 and it is also well above the average experienced prior to the
LEO constellation debut. In the four years prior to the launching of the LEO
constellations (1993-1996), the average annual commercial launch rate was
15.5.
Futron predicts the number of non-commercial launches will grow at a healthy rate in 2003 and again in 2004 (19.5% and 14.3% respectively). While two years is not nearly enough time to indicate a strong trend, this is a pronounced increase and it is sustained over more than just one year.
The GEO commercial satellite
market, traditionally viewed as a very attractive market by launch providers,
has gone through a roller coaster ride with an extreme high followed
immediately by an extreme low. Futron predicts that this market will settle
down for the next couple years.
Another trend emerging in the GEO comsat
market is the moderation in the growth of the size of the average GEO comsat.
As measured by the number of transponders, the average GEO comsat only grew by
about 3% recently (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: GEO Commercial Satellite Size

Market share has long been a
benchmark for launch providers (even though launch rate is a more direct
measure of the health of a launch company). In recent years, launch providers
have become increasingly aggressive in their sales and marketing activities.
Part of the sales strategy for most launch providers is to highlight the
attractive features of ones own launch vehicle, such as reliability,
schedule assurance, and customer service.
Without a doubt, there are
differences in these key characteristics among the various launch providers.
However, no single launch provider or launch nation is currently dominating the
market. Global launch buyers have more or less evenly divided up the market
among USA, European, and Russian launchers (see Figure 3). It should be noted
that many European launches involve dual-manifested Ariane 5 launches. Thus,
Europes market share in terms of satellites is slightly higher than shown
in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Commercial Launch Market Share, by Nation


There is a strong correlation between the number of commercial GEO comsats launched and the number previously ordered. The number of launches usually follows the number ordered by about three years (see Figure 4). While the correlation is not perfect, the two data points do track. If this correlation continues, 2005 could be a very challenging year for the launch industry.
Figure 4: GEO Commercial Communications Satellite Orders and Corresponding Launches with a 3-year Shift

Futron Overview
| Futron Overview Futron Corporation is a technology management consulting firm. Futron applies analytically rigorous decision-support methods to transform data into information. We collaborate closely with clients to relate decisions to future outcomes and measures of value. Our aerospace consulting services include market and industry analyses, safety and risk management, remote sensing, and communications and information management. Futron was founded in 1986 and is headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland with a branch office in Houston, Texas. Futron employs approximately 100 professionals and has annual revenues of over $10M. | ![]() Futron's headquarters in Bethesda, Maryland |
Summary of
Capabilities
Futrons Space and Telecommunications Division is
the industry leader in researching, analyzing, and forecasting space and
telecommunications markets and programs. Futron offers our commercial and
government clients a suite of proprietary, leadingedge analytic methodologies.
Our world-class team of market and policy analysts, economists, and engineers
bring unparalleled skills and expertise to each account.
Futron
Corporation
7315 Wisconsin Avenue
Suite 900W
Bethesda, Maryland
20814
USA
tel: +1 301 913 9372
http://www.futron.com